Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2026

Implementation and Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool in a Medical Oncology Chemotherapy Unit (146378)

Amy E Smith 1 2 , Kaitlyn Trompert-Thompson 1 , Colleen Crossman 1 , Deme Karikios 1 3
  1. Medical Oncology , Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW , Australia
  2. School of Medicine, Notre Dame University Australia, Sydney, Australia
  3. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Background

The Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District delivers cancer care across a large geographical region with the Nepean Cancer and Wellness Centre providing centralised outpatient services and a primary chemotherapy unit, supported by satellite chemotherapy units at Lithgow and Hawkesbury Hospitals, treating approximately 300 patients per week. Clinical support for these services is coordinated via a medical oncology registrar pager. This high patient volume generates frequent pager-based communication, contributing to workflow inefficiencies.

We aimed to develop a tool to support nursing decision-making, improve workflow, and maintain patient safety.

Methods

A service redesign approach was undertaken. Medical oncology registrar pager activity was audited using a purpose-built app, with data collected and analysed at monthly intervals over three months. Findings were presented at departmental meetings, where key stakeholders agreed on the development of a Clinical Decision Tool (CDT) using a co-design approach. Following implementation, a further three-month audit of registrar pager activity and survey of nursing staff tool experience was conducted to evaluate tool performance and its impact on clinical practice. Proportions were compared using Chi-squared testing.

Results

Baseline audit demonstrated that 66% of pager activity originated from the chemotherapy unit, with 33% of pages relating to routine blood test reviews. Following implementation of the CDT, the proportion of potentially avoidable pager interactions decreased from 68% to 44% (p = 0.04).

Eighteen nurses completed the post-implementation survey with an overall response rate of 72%. The majority strongly agreed that the CDT was easy to use (78%), that information was accessible (83%), that it improved confidence in clinical decision-making (83%), and that it supported safe practice (78%). Overall, 89% of nurses were very satisfied with the CDT.

 

Conclusions

Application of redesign methodology facilitated successful implementation of a CDT, supporting nursing decision-making while improving workflow efficiency in a high-volume cancer centre.