Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2026

Impact of a Standardized Chemotherapy Pre-Printed Order on Medication Safety in Gynecologic Oncology: A Pre–Post Quality Improvement Study at a Super-Tertiary Hospital in Thailand (144413)

Natchanon Sathapanapitagkit 1 , Irene Ruengkhachorn 2 , Phantip Benveniste 3 , Wathirada Karnchanabanyong 2
  1. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  3. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Department of Nursing, Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand

Aims

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has a narrow therapeutic index, and prescribing errors compromise efficacy and safety. In our gynecologic oncology service, the legacy pre-printed order (non-standardized, in use >20 years) was associated with guideline-discordant supportive care, cumulative-dose exceedance of high-risk agents, and a high error burden (annual mean chemotherapy-related problems 24.16±6.05% of prescriptions, 2017–2021; 76.2% attributable to the legacy order). We aimed to develop a standardized, evidence-based pre-printed order to improve guideline concordance and reduce medication errors.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre, pre–post quasi-experimental quality improvement study at a super-tertiary hospital. A multidisciplinary team (oncologists, pharmacists, nurses) redesigned the order based on international guidelines, incorporating checklist-based premedication and discharge medications, regimen-specific referenced templates, mandatory cumulative-dose fields (doxorubicin, etoposide, bleomycin), optimized antiemetic prophylaxis, and shortened infusion times. No accrual target was set; all consecutive prescriptions were included pre-implementation (1 January–31 May 2022; n=4,047) and post-implementation (1 June–31 October 2022; n=3,800). Medication errors identified through routine pharmacist review were classified by process stage.

Results

Guideline-concordant treatment increased from 65.6% to 99.1% (+33.5 percentage points, 95% CI 32.0–35.0), correct antiemetic prophylaxis from 42.1% to 98.2% (+56.1, 95% CI 54.5–57.7), and CINV severity ≤grade 1 from 78.2% to 92.1% (all p<0.001). All error categories fell: prescribing 22.6% to 4.2% (−18.4, 95% CI −19.8 to −17.0), preparation 34.8% to 2.1%, dispensing 6.3% to 2.3% (all p<0.001). Cumulative-dose exceedance was eliminated (1.3% to 0%, p=0.02). Preparation time decreased 32.1% (8.0±5.2 to 5.4±1.1 minutes, p=0.01); staff satisfaction rose from 73% (22/30) to 97% (29/30) (p=0.01).

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary, standardised pre-printed order improved guideline concordance, antiemetic appropriateness, and workflow efficiency while markedly reducing medication errors and eliminating cumulative-dose exceedance. Despite the single-centre pre–post design, this low-cost intervention is readily transferable to other oncology settings seeking safer chemotherapy.